|
1
|
- Stephen Yang
- Peksung Intellectual Property Ltd.
- March 19, 2009 Cleveland Intellectual Property Law Association
|
|
2
|
- I. Prosecution
- II. Enforcement
- III. Third Amendment
|
|
3
|
- April 1, 1985 Patent Law came into effect
- Sept 4, 1992 First Amendment
- Aug 25, 2000 Second Amendment
- Dec 27, 2008 Third Amendment
- New law comes into effect Oct 1, 2009
|
|
4
|
- Patent Type & Term
- Invention 20 years
- Utility Model 10 years
- Design 10 years
- Counted from filing date
- no extension
- no adjustment
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
- Valid only in mainland China
- Invention patents extendable to H.K & Macao
- Patents in H.K., Macao & Taiwan
- H.K.: 2-step process
- Macao: 1-step
- TW: priority not recognized
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
- Rejection appealable to the Patent Re-examination Board (P.R.B)
- Patent Re-examination Board (P.R.B)
- Re-examination
- Invalidation
- PRB decisions appealable to Court
- Court: 2 instances
|
|
11
|
- Request for invalidation at P.R.B
- Anyone could file invalidation request after grant, including patentee
itself
- No re-issue or central limitation (EPC 2000)
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
- Local novelty*
- - World wide publication
- - Domestic use
- Grace period: 6 months before filing date
- - limited scenarios
- - not recommended to rely on
- * = change
|
|
14
|
- Scientific discoveries
- Rules and methods for mental activities
- Methods for the diagnosis or for the treatment of diseases
- Animal and plant varieties
- separate legislation on plant varieties
- Substances obtained by means of nuclear transformation
|
|
15
|
- Business method
- method of doing transactions not patentable
- Patentable subject matter: a technical solution
- technical means
- technical problem
- technical effect
|
|
16
|
- Mental activities
- algorithm
- software product
- computer program
- computer game
- computer readable medium (distinguishing feature?)
|
|
17
|
- Available only to products with features of shape and structure
- Newly allowed:
- Substitution of the material making up a product without changing the
shape or structure
- Molecular structure, composition, metallurgical phase structure of a
substance excluded
|
|
18
|
- 30 months from the earliest priority date
- 2 months extension available
|
|
19
|
- At the time of request for substantive examination
- 3 months from receipt of Notification of Entering Substantive
Examination Procedure
- No voluntary amendment allowed in response to OA
- Replace old set of claims with a new set of claims
- Introducing new independent claims
|
|
20
|
- Deadline for filing divisionals
- 2 months from receipt of Notice of Grant for parent application
- Voluntarily filing divisional from divisional
- parent application must not have been granted
- Always deliberately make divisional lack of unity
|
|
21
|
- Sufficient disclosure - very strict practice
- Late submission of experiment data
- To meet sufficiency: must be included in original disclosure
- To prove inventiveness: late submission allowed as evidence, cannot be
added to description
|
|
22
|
- Amendment going beyond original disclosure
- Amendment directly & unambiguously determined from original
disclosure
- No other way of interpreting the relevant content
- Abstract NOT part of original disclosure
|
|
23
|
- I. Prosecution
- II. Enforcement
- III. Third Amendment
|
|
24
|
- For invention/utility model
- Make, use, offer to sell, sell, import the patented product
- Use the patented process
- Use, offer to sell, sell or import the product directly obtained by the
patented process
- For design*
- make, sell or import the product incorporating a patented design
|
|
25
|
- Use, offer to sell or sell following the right exhaustion of the
patentee
- Continuation of prior use or make
- Use in the means of transport temporarily passing China
- Research exemption
|
|
26
|
- Use or sale of patent infringing products not liable to compensate, if
- Not knowing infringement, &
- Proof of legitimate source
|
|
27
|
- Administrative resolution - local IP office
- not a court
- not a necessary procedure prior to judicial resolution
- Judicial resolution – court of law
|
|
28
|
- Administrative authorities’ power:
- Order to stop infringement; and
- Mediate amount of damages upon request
- Corresponding potential remedies:
- Order ®
administrative lawsuit
- Mediation ® civil
lawsuit
|
|
29
|
- Seize and preserve infringing goods
- Impose a fine - based on infringer’s profit
- Inspection on the accused infringer’s premises – raids
- If infringement is found
- seal and seize infringing products or devices used to produce the
infringing products,
- access to the accounting record of the infringer, if infringement is
found
- ※ for trademarks
|
|
30
|
- Uniform Court System
- Judicial system
- Supreme People’s Court
- High People’s Court
- Intermediate People’s Court
- Basic People’s court
|
|
31
|
- Courts qualified to handle patent case
- usually start at Intermediate
People’s Court
- Two instances of trials
- Civil or administrative lawsuit
|
|
32
|
- Infringement & validity handled separately
- Possible co-existence of:
- Infringement proceedings in court &
- Invalidation procedures at the PRB
- Decision appealable to court (different court)
|
|
33
|
- Acceptance
- Service of document to the defendant
- Written reply of defendant
- Presentation of evidence
- Exchange of evidence (optional)
- Trial
- Judgment
- Appeal
|
|
34
|
- Remedies available at Court
- Injunctive relief
- Monetary relief
- Before formal legal proceedings
- preliminary injunction
- preservation of property
|
|
35
|
- Statutory limitation for legal proceedings against patent infringement
- Two years, counted from the date of patentee’s or interested party’s
knowledge of the infringing act
|
|
36
|
- Rules applicable to determining infringement, among others:
- Doctrine of equivalents
- Prosecution history estoppel
|
|
37
|
- Infringer’s illegal Profit
- Patentee’s Loss
- Based on reasonable royalties
- Statutory damages determined by court
|
|
38
|
- Crime: only for patent passing off
- Punishment
- Detention: 1~6 months;
- Imprisonment: 6 months~3 years; and/or
- Pecuniary penalty
|
|
39
|
- Local IP office
- Investigation and/or on-site inspection
- Preliminary injunction not available
- Mediation on damages
- Appealable to court
- Less costly and time-consuming
- Court of law
- Evidence and/or property preservation
- Preliminary injunction available
- Award damages
- Appealable to higher court
- More costly and time-consuming
|
|
40
|
- I. Prosecution
- II. Enforcement
- III. Third Amendment
|
|
41
|
- Absolute novelty adopted
- Definition of ‘conflicting application’ changed
- filed before filing date and published on or after filing date
- current: limited to applications filed by others
- new: applications filed by anyone
|
|
42
|
- No Patent, if
- completion of invention relies on genetic resource; and
- acquisition and exploitation of genetic resource in violation of laws
and regulations
|
|
43
|
- If completion of invention relies on genetic resource
- the direct source & original source of the genetic resource must be
indicated in the application
- original source cannot be indicated – must explain
- violation possibly ground for rejection and invalidation
|
|
44
|
- Method of calculating damages
- firstly: loss of right holder
- secondly: gain of infringer
- thirdly: reasonable times of royalty
- finally: statutory damage determined by court
- Damages may include “reasonable expense for stopping infringement”
- Statutory damages doubled to up to 100, 000 Euro
|
|
45
|
- Pre-trial evidence preservation available
- court decides in 48 hours
- bond required in most cases
- formal lawsuit in 15 days
|
|
46
|
- Passing off
- fine: 4 times gain of infringer (currently 3 times)
- fine up to 200K RMB (currently 50K)
- possibly criminal charges
|
|
47
|
- Administrative authority’s power strengthened
- in dealing with passing-off ONLY
- questioning, investigation, onsite inspection, access to contracts
& accounting records, inspecting & confiscating products.
|
|
48
|
- Parallel import considered exhaustion of rights
- importing products sold by patentee or licensee
- Bolar-type exemption available
- make, use or import patent medicament or medical devices for regulatory
approval
|
|
49
|
- Prior art defense available to accused infringer
- special significance in China -- utility model & design not
examined
- Evaluation report required
- for enforcing utility model & design
- not just search report
- must be done by SIPO
|
|
50
|
- Conditions:
- 3 yrs after grant, 4 yrs after filing date; or
- patentee’s act considered as monopoly
- For domestic market unless otherwise prescribed
- Semiconductor inventions
- compulsory license granted for public interest only
- Manufacture a medicament & export to countries:
- as prescribed in treaties to which China is a member
|
|
51
|
- Absolute novelty standard adopted
- Concept of conflicting applications introduced
- Inventiveness-like requirement
- Substantively different from prior design or the combination of
features in prior designs
- No conflict with rights of others prior to filing date
- Planar printed matter primarily for identification purpose excluded
|
|
52
|
- Two or more similar designs for the same product may be filed in a
single application
- Brief explanation must be filed
|
|
53
|
- Evaluation report required for enforcement
- Offering for sale an act of infringement
- Brief explanation usable to interpret scope
|
|
54
|
- Abandoned
- Current: Chinese entity must first file in China for inventions made in
China
- Security check from SIPO required to file overseas for inventions made
in China
- Penalty for violation -- No Chinese patent
- Apply to invention and utility model ONLY
- No approval needed for design
|
|
55
|
- International patent agency license available to every patent firm
- Currently special designation required
|
|
56
|
- Same entity, same day files utility model & invention application
- allowed to abandon granted utility model and get patent for invention
- If not filed on same day – conflicting applications
- currently not considered conflicting
|
|
57
|
- If no agreement between owners, each owner
- individually exploit the invention; or
- non-exclusive license to others
- Royalty shared between joint owners
- All owners must agree on other activities
|
|
58
|
- Boutique IP: Patent (70%) + Trademark (30%)
- Prosecution & litigation
- 9 partners, professionals 55, total staff 80
- 3 offices: Beijing, Shenzhen, Palo Alto (liaison)
- All partners have overseas experience
- Language skills
- High profile litigation
- Represent prestigious clients, domestic and overseas
|
|
59
|
- Stephen Yang
- Partner, Patent Attorney
- Peksung Intellectual Property Ltd.
- 908 Shining Tower, 35 Xueyuan Road
- Beijing, 100191, China
- Tel: +86-10-8231-1199
- Fax: +86-10-8231-1780
- yyong@peksung.com
- www.peksung.com
|